If anyone knows how to get this fully debated by the wider wikipedia community please feel free to enable the discussion. Make a Gadget? Anomie⚔ 16:41, (UTC) Well, this is obviously something that is going to need the input of more than us few editors. M 18:18, (UTC) For my part, I prefer the links where they are. You would not even need to track along that line to the right hand side. Further, you wouldn't need to get used to it - whenever you click one of those links, you first look at the heading, and the edit link would be right there beside it. 17:32, (UTC) You would quickly get used to it. Just because one fix exists doesn't mean we shouldn't explore others. Amalthea 16:44, (UTC) Except it is broke, hence why the template is called FixBunching. If floating divs are placed in separate sections, or if they have widely different widths, then the result is not really satisfactory. Den dodge T C 16:39, (UTC) FixBunching is a very very poor workaround, and works only in limited conditions. As for the concerns about bunching and stacking of edit links where images are floated right, that's what is for. It's in a standard place now, so you can just flick to the right hand side of the page, and that's where I'd keep looking if it were moved. Mjroots (talk) 15:47, (UTC) I don't like this idea. Let's hope it gets noticed and taken forward. PL290 (talk) 09:13, (UTC) So, it looks like the general consensus so far is that this is a desirable feature. M 05:40, (UTC) I notice it's less jarring (while still jarring enough) on that German page by virtue of a smaller font and a subscript effect (and this despite 'Bearbeiten' having two-and-a-half times as many characters as 'Edit'). Shakescene (talk) 23:37, (UTC) Jarring as well they should be - footnotes, because people should get used to wanting to see sources, but the edit link especially, because we'd like more people to notice it, and edit the pages. On the other hand, putting right after every heading and sub-heading can be jarring to the eye of ordinary, casual readers, just as too many in-line footnotes can be. You end up making lots of ugly white space, re-sizing images, or moving images around, just in order to keep '' in a useful, non-disruptive place without stacking. Anomie⚔ 23:27, (UTC) This has been a constant problem for those editing articles for New York City, especially pages and sections about demography and elections. edits) 21:56, (UTC) They move the link around with Javascript.
Where is the code for that kept? Somewhere in MediaWiki: namespace? OrangeDog (talk On the far right, it often gets tangled up with images and other links how many editors have clicked the wrong edit link when there is a cluster? - John Broughton(♫♫) 20:53, (UTC) An example in another wikipedia (de) is this page. Some other language Wikipedias (French, German, Italian) have the link just after the section heading, where it is more visible than having it to the far right. M 19:54, (UTC) Also agreed (to both suggestions).